watermark-light

Grievance Procedure

 

How it works

This Grievance Procedure has been established for Wilmar to address grievances from parties, including individuals, government organizations and non-governmental organizations concerning the implementation of Wilmar’s No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation (NDPE) Policy. We recognise that providing this feedback mechanism for stakeholders is important because it helps in the monitoring of compliance with Wilmar’s NDPE policy throughout our operations and supply chain.

The Grievance Procedure also promotes transparency and accountability, through disclosure of our full list of grievances, with updates on our actions to address them. 

Submit Grievance

Grievances can be submitted through any of the following channels:

By email to
grievance_procedure@wilmar.com.sg

By telephone to
+60 3 2119 9000

By fax to
+60 3 2026 2142

By messaging the following local mobile numbers via SMS or WhatsApp
Malaysia: +60 1 3551 6930 
Indonesia: +62 812 1378 7839 
These hotlines are available during and outside office hours

In writing to
Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd 
28 Biopolis Road 
Singapore 138568
Attention: Sustainability Department (Grievance Coordinator)

Ineligible Grievance List

As per Wilmar Grievance Procedure, we investigate all cases which are received. Based on the evidence received to date, the cases listed here are those that are classified as ineligible grievances and will not be further investigated. 

Updated: April 2024

XX grievances found

Company Received Grievance Report Stakeholders Subject Matter and Progress Progress Update
Sime Darby Plantation Berhad 2020070606 Jul 2020 Report can be found here Liberty Shared Status: Case closed

Alleged labour rights violation in Sime Darby Plantation Berhad’s operation
On 6 July 2020, Liberty Shared (LS) published a summary of their petition to the United States Customs and Border Protection (US CBP) to “exclude palm oil and palm oil products produced wholly or in part by forced labour and child labour by Sime Darby Plantation Berhad (SDP) owned and affiliated companies.” The petition was submitted to the US CBP on 20 April 2020.

SDP clarified that the petition was submitted to US CBP without solicitation of feedback from the organization, and that it had access only to the petition summary, which does not contain details of issues raised by LS. SDP has since engaged with Duncan Jepson, the author of the petition, to better understand and expeditiously resolve the concerns raised. SDP has published the following statements in response to LS based on the limited information that was available to it. The statements reiterate SDP’s commitment to uphold human rights and good labour practices, as well as implement appropriate corrective actions to eradicate any human rights violations.

  1. First statement dated 8 July 2020
  2. Second statement dated 10 July 2020
  3. Third statement dated 7 August 2020

On 10 November 2020, SDP announced the appointment of Independent Experts to further strengthen its human rights commitments and compliance. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) was appointed on 19 October 2020 to support SDP in establishing effective platforms and channels of communication to address concerns in its Malaysian operations. The other appointment is of an independent international specialist on migrant worker rights to assist SDP in improving its migrant worker recruitment processes (further details below).

On 18 November 2020, The Associated Press (AP) published an article  titled Rape, abuses in palm oil fields linked to top beauty brands”, which reported abuse of women in SDP’s plantations. SDP released a public statement in response to the article, reiterating zero tolerance for any forms of sexual or human rights violations, exploitation or any other criminal offenses. SDP stated that it had commenced further internal investigations over the allegation and is committed to take all necessary actions. On 3 December 2020, SDP issued a second statement, identifying the specific case highlighted by AP. SDP explained that the complainant had withdrawn her complaint in April 2019, two months after it was first brought to light. In revisiting the matter, the complainant indicated that she had no intention of reopening the case and denied that offensive statements had been made to her in the first place. SDP thus had no basis to pursue further investigations and have closed the case again.

Despite SDP’s efforts, on 30 December 2020, US CBP issued a  Withhold Release Order (WRO) that all U.S. ports of entry will detain palm oil and products containing palm oil produced by SDP and its subsidiaries, joint ventures, and affiliated entities in Malaysia. The issuance of the WRO was based on information that reasonably indicated the presence of all 11 of the International Labour Organization’s forced labour indicators in SDP’s production process. SDP issued a statement in response to the WRO on 31 December 2020, reiterating its pledge to combat forced labour. The statement also indicated that CBP had still not provided sufficient information to allow SDP to meaningfully address the allegations that triggered the issuance of the WRO. RSPO also issued a statement on the WRO, urging USCBP to share any information that will allow for RSPO to properly investigate this matter and report transparently on the findings.

In continuing its efforts to resolve the issue, SDP has announced the establishment of its Experts Stakeholder Human Rights Assessment Commission (the Commission) on 1 March 2021. SDP has appointed Impactt Ltd, an ethical trade consultancy and expert in the detection and remediation of labour issues in supply chains, to the Commission, to conduct an evaluation of SDP’s labour practices across its Malaysian operations. The Commission will also consist of a Stakeholder Consultation Panel (the Stakeholder Panel), who will provide additional views on Impactt’s assessment methodology and review forced labour indicators in SDP’s operations as well as proposed remediation plans. Members of the Stakeholder Panel include Shift, the leading centre of expertise on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and Mr. Andy Hall, a migrant worker rights specialist. SDP expects the independent assessments by Impactt to be completed by May 2021, following which disclosure will be made by to SDP’s key stakeholders and the public, on the Commission’s findings.

On 4 June 2021, SDP appointed Professor Justine Nolan, a human rights expert, to its Commission and reported that it was expecting Impactt’s evaluation of its labour practices in Malaysia to be completed in June 2021. On 15 July 2021, SDP dissolved the Commission to provide for more time for the evaluation exercise to be carried out. SDP cited delays due to COVID-19 travel restrictions and that oversight of the evaluation will be undertaken by its Board’s Sustainability Committee.

On 28 January 2022, the US CBP determined that certain SDP palm oil products are produced using convict, forced or indentured labour. SDP in its statement reiterated its efforts to undertake a full-scale, independent assessment across its Malaysian operations and reaffirmed that it would fully cooperate with the US CBP in demonstrating full compliance with US import regulations. 

On 15 February, SDP announced improvements to its governance structures, policies and procedures. This includes the following:
  • Reimbursement of recruitment fees: Following calculations by an independent third party, SDP’s Board approved a provision of Rm82.02 million in reimbursements to its current and past foreign workers. Workers will receive their monies on 17 February 2022 and have access to various channels of communication to raise concerns. SDP has also set up a Sinking Fund Governance Committee (SFGC) to oversee the reimbursement process and is engaging law firms in each country of origin to management the disbursement of funds.
  • Ethical recruitment: SDP launched its Responsible Recruitment Procedure (RRP) in August 2021, which emphasises the appointment of suitable recruitment agents in ensuring non-exploitation of workers. SDP is committing to conducting regular due diligence on appointed recruitment agents and monitor their performance to ensure compliance to SDP’s recruitment standards. Agents who are in breach will have their contracts terminated.
  • Worker welfare: SDP has rolled out various communication platforms to enable workers to raise concerns and grievances. Existing grievance and whistleblowing changes have also been improved, following the establishment of a centralised Grievance unit at Headquarters. All workers have also been provided with personal lockers to store their passports.
  • Structural changes: SDP’s Board has approved an ESG scorecard across its Upstream Malaysia operations and established a new Social Welfare & Services (SWS) department. The various initiatives are overseen by SDP’s Board Sustainability Committee, and supported by a two-tier management team which meets regularly.

  • On 3 February 2023, the US CBP has modified its forced labor findings against SDP effective immediately, the US CBP will now permit the importation of palm oil from SDP into the United States and has recognized the comprehensive process undertaken by SDP in the last two years to review, revise and upgrade its protocols for recruiting, managing and working with its workers. SDP has also released a press statement to further brief on actions taken.
    Mopoli Raya 2020021818 Feb 2020 Report can be found here Rainforest Action Network (RAN) Status: Case closed

    Alleged involvement in labour right issues by PT Mopoli Raya
    Engagement was immediately initiated with PT Mopoli Raya (MR) when the allegation of non-payment of worker’s wages at PT MR and PT Alue Kuyun was brought to Wilmar's attention. The withholding of workers’ wages led to a strike on 30 January 2020, where the Bupati (local regent) of West Aceh had also publicly urged PT MR to resolve the issues. 

    PT MR clarified that due to their financial situation, they were unable to process all the wage payments. They reiterated that they are committed to continue engagement with their workers and the union, to address the issue amicably. 

    The Wilmar team conducted a field visit from 9 – 13 March 2020 to further investigate the case, in order to understand the root cause of the incident and assist PT MR to develop an action plan to address the issues. During the field visit, our team met with PT MR’s management team, visited Alue Kuyun palm oil mill, PT MR's plantations, and interviewed several concerned parties, including workers from the mill/plantation and union representatives from Serikat Pekerja Aneka Industri - Federasi Serikat Pekerja Metal Indonesia (SPAI-FSPMI). 

    Due to a financial crisis, PT MR has already ceased most of its non-essential activities including manuring and spraying for several years. Many workers had left PT MR to work for other companies, and those who remained with the company are mainly community members living near the company premises. During our interviews with workers, we were informed that in general, their working relationship with the company has been conducive. The company had also paid them bonuses up to two months in the past, when the company was making profit. In addition, the company has adopted several policies in protecting worker’s rights and freedom of association. The workers are able to freely join the union, and approximately 50% of the workers there are unionised. 

    However, due to continued financial constraints, PT MR was not been able to pay November 2019 and December 2019 wages in full to the workers. Only 50% of the wages were paid. On 11 January 2020, the unions and workers demanded for PT MR to settle all outstanding wages by 15 January 2020, which PT MR was unable to do. This hence triggered the strike on 30 January 2020, with over 600 workers joining the strike. 

    On 17 February 2020, a multi-stakeholder meeting was held in West Aceh Bupati’s office, which was attended by representatives from the Regional Secretary, 0105 Military District Comander, West Aceh Police Department, West Aceh Transmigration and Manpower Agency,  West Aceh Regency Plantation and Livestock Department, Union representative FSPMI of PT MR, and PT MR’s management team. A wage payment schedule was successfully developed and agreed upon by all parties during the meeting. 

    During our visit, we confirmed that PT MR has followed the payment schedule and in fact has advanced the February 2020 payment earlier than the agreed schedule. In 2021 however, Wilmar was informed that due to the continued financial situation of PT MR, the company had been declared bankrupt. Workers' wages were settled by PT MR up to March 2021. Wilmar has therefore ceased sourcing from PT MR since April 2021. 
    Runding Putra Persada 2022091919 Sep 2022 Report can be found here. Rainforest Action Network (RAN) Status: Case closed

    Non-compliant palm products from Mr. Mahmudin, a smallholder operating in the Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve (RSWR) area allegedly enter Wilmar’s supply chain through its supplier, PT Runding Putra Persada (PT RPP) via a Fresh Fruit Bunch (FFB) dealer CV Buana Indah (CV BI).

    Non-compliant palm products from Mr. Mahmudin, a smallholder operating in the Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve (RSWR) area allegedly entered Wilmar’s supply chain through its supplier, PT Runding Putra Persada (PT RPP) via a Fresh Fruit Bunch (FFB) dealer CV Buana Indah (CV BI).

    Wilmar does not source from CV BI. However, our supplier, PT RPP was allegedly sourcing from CV BI. Wilmar immediately initiated engagement with PT RPP when allegations of their non-compliant sourcing within RSWR was brought to our attention in September 2022.  According to the report, Mr. Mahmudin was operating illegally within RSWR and was supplying to PT RPP via CV BI. 

    On 31 October 2022, RAN published additional information on the case titled “Major Indonesian Palm Oil Suppliers Falsely Deny Sourcing Illegal Palm Oil” on the issue linked to Mr. Mahmudin’s farm that allegedly extends beyond the boundary of the RSWR. 

    A series of meeting and engagement with PT RPP was carried out thereafter. A field verification from 7 to 15 November 2022 has been carried out to verify the allegation and to support the development of an action plan to address the issues identified. The field visit concluded that Mr Mahmudin has a certificate of ownership (SHM) covering an area of 29 hectares. However, he has further claimed ownership of additional 4 hectares within RSWR which has not yet been allocated SHM. In addition, Mr Mahmudin’s FFB collection point also lacks adequate traceability mechanism to map the FFB that are sourced from the local community farms around Mr Mahmudin's farm. It has been confirmed that CV BI is indeed PT RPP’s supplier, which they have started sourcing since April 2022.

    The outcome of the investigation and the action plan were discussed with RAN on 1 December 2022. The final field verification report has also been shared with RAN on 21 December 2022.

    In March 2023, a verification field visit was undertaken to assess the progress of the action plan.  It was found that PT RPP has made improvements to the traceability system but the supply chain data collection at CV BI and the handover of 4 hectares of Mr. Mahmudin's land inside RSWR were progressing slower than expected. In order to accelerate progress to meet the action plan targets by June 2023, further assistance will be extended to PT RPP on its traceability programme and our team will engage with Mr. Mahmudin and CV BI in May 2023.  The full report is available here.  

    In May 2023, a follow up field visit was carried out.  PT RPP has achieved 94% Traceability to Plantation (TtP) and its staff have been trained on the traceability system.  After a delayed start on the traceability mapping process due to unforeseen circumstances, Koltiva began the traceability work on CV BI’s and Mr Mahmudin’s suppliers in March and May 2023 respectively. Thus, Koltiva has revised timeline for 100% TtP to September 2023. During this visit, the field team also discussed with Mr. Mahmudin on the progress of the land release of the 4 hectares. 

    In early June 2023, our team met with Balai Konservasi & Sumber Daya Alam, BKSDA (Agency of Conservation and Natural Resources) as the authority for management and monitoring of RSWR, and Balai Pemantapan Kawasan Hutan, BPKH (Agency of Forest Area Consolidation Center) as the authority for boundary marking of RSWR, with the aim to understand the management and monitoring of RSWR, and process of releasing land occupied by community within the RSWR. 

    In June 2023, another follow up field visit was carried out.  Mr. Mahmudin was not available to meet with field team during this field visit.  The field team was later informed that Mr. Mahmudin was not willing to sign the commitment letter to release the 4 hectares. Consequently, PT RPP and CV BI have issued a statement on 13 July 2023 to exclude Mr. Mahmudin from their supply chain. With this latest development, Wilmar has also included Mr. Mahmudin on its list of “high risk” FFB supplier, where all Wilmar direct suppliers operating within the 50km radius of the Leuser Ecosystem will be notified on the development of this case. Mr. Mahmudin’s FFB will only be allowed to enter their supply chain when the case is resolved to our satisfaction. 

    A verification visit was carried out in October 2023 to assess PT RPP and CV BI’s progress in achieving 100% traceability.  The documents and traceability data provided by PT RPP and CV BI, developed with support from Koltiva, showed that the 100% TtP has been achieved.  The traceability data also indicated that neither PT RPP nor CV BI has sourced FFB from Mr. Mahmudin since 13 July 2023, when both PT RPP and CV BI issued a statement to exclude Mr. Mahmudin from their supply chain. In addition, PT. RPP has also carried out an evaluation of all CV BI suppliers to ensure that all FFB supply is sourced from outside of the RSWR. 

    Considering that PT. RPP has completed the required activities as per the agreed action plan, the case on PT. RPP can be considered resolved. The summary of the outcome of the investigation and key milestone are available in this Joint Closing Statement.  


    AA Sawit, a company allegedly linked to our supplier Jernih Kemboja. 2022072626 Jul 2022 Report can be found here. Mighty Earth Status: Case closed

    Alleged deforestation by AA Sawit, a company allegedly linked to our supplier Jernih Kemboja.

    AA Sawit is not a supplier to Wilmar. Our supplier, Jernih Kemboja, however is implicated due to their association with AA Sawit.  

    Wilmar immediately initiated engagement with Jernih Kemboja when allegations of deforestation at PTD 4882, 4085, 4963, 4118, 4177 and 4121  by AA Sawit was brought to our attention in July 2022. A field investigation was carried in August 2022 to verify the allegations. Our field investigation as well as LUCA analysis on their concession maps thereafter has confirmed that there is non-compliance to the No Deforestation commitment to the NDPE Policy.

    Wilmar’s last purchase from this supplier was in September 2022.

    As of October 2023, Jernih Kemboja has met all the requirements stipulated in our
    re-entry criteria. This includes their commitment to the development of a Recovery Plan for Non-Compliant Land Clearing to the NDPE policy at group level, for activity that has taken place from January 2016 onwards. Based on the detailed review of documentation, reports and a letter of commitment from Jernih Kemboja, the Wilmar Suspension Committee has given due consideration of this progress and lifted the suspension of Jernih Kemboja in October 2023. 

    Dewa Rencana Perangin Angin 2022012424 Jan 2022 Report can be found here Wilmar Status: Case closed

    Alleged labour rights violation in PT Dewa Rencana Perangin Angin’s (PT DRPA) operation.
    Wilmar immediately reached out to Dewa Rencana Perangin Angin (PT DRPA) in January 2022 for clarification when the allegation of forced labour in PT DRPA was brought to our attention. However, despite several engagement attempts made since January 2022, we were unable to establish engagement with PT DRPA. We have therefore ceased sourcing from PT DRPA since January 2022.
    Gilford Ltd, a subsidiary of Rimbunan Hijau (PNG) Group 2021100707 Oct 2021 Report can be found here  Global Witness Status: Case in progress

    Alleged deforestation, land rights and labour rights violations by Gilford Ltd, a subsidiary of Rimbunan Hijau (RH).
    In July 2021, a letter was sent to Wilmar’s customers from the NGO Global Witness (GW), alleging environmental and social non-compliance incidents by Rimbunan Hijau (RH). A summary of the allegations in the letter were as follows:
    • Environmental degradation and deforestation activities;
    • Violence and harassment against community members, through local police;
    • Lack of Free, Prior, Informed Consent (FPIC) prior to development of land;
    • Decent accommodation and facility for employees living in company housing; and
    • Workers’ health and safety.
    Wilmar immediately reached out to RH for clarification on the issues raised by GW, and has been actively engaging with the company since. RH has rebutted the allegations and provided us with all relevant documents which include:
    • A field visit report by an independent consultant;
    • Evidence of engagements between RH and GW since 2017;
    • Landowner consent forms to ascertain FPIC and identify cultural sites that require protection;
    • Voluntarily written statements by a landowner, contents of which were further corroborated by a statement given by a local ward councillor;
    • Correspondence between Gilford Ltd and the Royal Papua New Guinea (PNG) Constabulary;
    • Board meeting minutes by landowner companies; and
    • A mediated agreement between Gilford Ltd and a landowner company issued by the PNG National Court.
    The extensive supporting documents shared by RH has generally clarified the issues raised in GW’s letter, except on the matter of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) provision to its workers, which still warrants further investigation and engagement with RH in order to close the issue.

    On the allegation of lack of FPIC, RH has reaffirmed that landowners’ consent (i.e. FPIC) is a legally stipulated requirement in PNG to obtain a Special Agricultural Business Lease (SABL), which they are in adherence to. Further to this, a voluntary statement by one of the landowners which was shared with us has also indicated that FPIC was in order, prior to land development. With regards to the allegation of violence and harassment, RH informed us that any reported police presence was sanctioned by the Royal PNG Constabulary and that no malpractice was proven, following investigations by high-level authorities, including the Ombudsman Commission.

    On the allegation of deforestation and environmental issues, RH has clarified that their operational planning and execution are compliant with all legal requirements. In fact, such compliance was monitored by the PNG Forest Authority Project Supervisor onsite, to ensure protection of all culturally important sites, and other specific protected areas such as buffer zones along rivers and streams; village reserves; conservation zones for fauna and flora; as well as sites of historical importance such as old village sites and caves. Since project commencement, they have not received any specific complaints from any affected landowners, ward councillors, village court officials, or any government officials on environmental matters. In addition, it is also important to note that Wilmar has engaged with Gilford Ltd since 2018 on their compliance to NDPE, where Gilford has committed to carrying out HCV-HCS assessments prior to any new land clearing. A moratorium on new land clearing has been imposed since 2018. For more information related to this case, please refer to Wilmar’s Grievance List, the case registered in 2018 under Gilford Ltd.

    On the matter of PPE provision, Wilmar will be working closely with RH to ensure that their practices are fully aligned with our NDPE Policy. This includes improvements to their PPE Policy and socialisation of the policy to all levels of management and operations, with effective on-the-ground implementation.

    On 7 October 2021, GW released a public report titled ’The True Price of Palm Oil’. The allegations on RH in this report are largely similar to the letter that was sent to Wilmar’s customers in July 2021. The Report however contains additional information related to RH’s health and safety practices.

    Wilmar continues to monitor and investigate the remaining issues related to worker PPE Provision and RH’s safety and health practices, and will guide RH towards resolution of this case.
    IOI Corporation Berhad (IOI) 2021063030 Jun 2021 Report can be found here Finnwatch Status: Case closed

    Alleged labour rights violations at IOI’s Mekassar Estate, Pahang, Malaysia 

    Wilmar immediately initiated engagement with IOI when the allegations were brought to our attention in June 2021. Full details of this case is available on IOI’s grievance list.

    We understand that Finnwatch has engaged with IOI since August 2020, where they have informed IOI of several allegations highlighted by a grievance raiser on behalf of five workers, consisting of:

    On 2 June 2023, RSPO Complaint Panel who investigated the case has dismissed the case.

    For more information on RSPO’s deliberation, please refer to the case tracker

    1. Mistreatment from the estate’s supervisor
    2. Inconsistency in issuance of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
    3. Not allowing workers to speak to auditors
    4. Dissatisfaction regarding housing facilities
    5. Disagreement in wage payments
    6. Alleged payment of recruitment fees

    Following this, IOI immediately formed an internal investigation team to address the allegations.

    On 11 September 2020, IOI updated Finnwatch on the matter of mistreatment, issuance of PPE and the worker being disallowed from speaking to auditors. In the update, IOI included explanations on the regular issuance of PPEs, and that in IOI, there was no restriction placed on auditors with regards to who they choose to interview during audits. IOI also disputed the allegation that workers were not allowed to speak with auditors. IOI further acknowledged that there was an incident of mistreatment of a worker by an estate employee and clarified that action had been taken by IOI management against the employee in question.  

    On 14 October 2020, IOI provided supporting documents, photos and videos from its internal investigations to Finnwatch on the issue of wage disagreement, and dissatisfaction regarding housing facilities.

    On 13 November 2020, IOI informed Finnwatch that on the issue of illegal payments made during recruitment by the aggrieved workers, IOI had made several attempts to contact the person involved but was not successful.

    On 16 December 2020, IOI presented its “Guideline for Providing Basic Amenities to Workers” which ensures uniform implementation of amenities provided to all estate workers, and a guideline on “Worker’s Work Verification”, which enables workers to verify their working hours. IOI also shared updates with Finnwatch on progress made with regards to workers’ repatriation back to India. On the issue of recruitment fee, IOI provided reassurance to Finnwatch that investigations were ongoing on the matter, in line with IOI’s No Recruitment Fee policy.

    On 23 February 2021, IOI informed Finnwatch that it had no way of confirming transactions that had occurred in India relating to recruitment fees. In response to the issue however, IOI suspended the recruitment agency involved as well as recruitment of workers from India, and added that it would be reporting the findings to authorities in India for further formal investigation.

    On 28 June 2021, IOI reiterated that the issue of illegal monies collected from workers in India for recruitment was beyond their jurisdiction and would require cooperation from the Indian government.

    On 2 July 2021, IOI published a Statement in Response to Finnwatch’s Report addressing the allegations. In the Statement, IOI also reaffirmed commitment to its “No Recruitment Fees Policy” since 2017, highlighted its “Guideline for Minimum Wage & Leave Pay” and “Worker’s Work Verification Guideline”, and mentioned that it will be undergoing an audit on its plantation operating units to ascertain non-compliance with its labour policies or unsatisfactory working conditions. 

    On 21 July 2021, IOI published an update on its first virtual Sustainability Consultation Forum. IOI engaged BSR (Business for Social Responsibility) to develop and facilitate the Forum, which was held in May 2021 and attended by 40 of IOI’s internal and external stakeholders. Discussions at the Forum were centred around efforts to address current labour challenges faced by IOI and the Malaysian palm oil sector, with a specific focus on Responsible Recruitment Practices especially in Peninsular Malaysia and legalisation of undocumented workers in Sabah. An Executive Summary of the Forum can be found here.

    On 13 January 2022, IOI published a further update on outcomes and action plans arising from the Forum, which includes active engagement with relevant stakeholders such as RSPO and ILO to develop solutions for responsible recruitment practices, and the setting up of a working group to discuss approaches to legalise undocumented workers in Sabah. Further details are available here.

    On 2 June 2023, the RSPO Complaints Panel concluded its investigation into the allegations and dismissed the case.  For more information on RSPO Complaints Panel's deliberation, please refer to the case tracker

    Mitra Abadimas Sejahtera, subsidiary of Chora Agro Resources 2021060202 Jun 2021